Waving the Ethically Challenged White Flag

City Councilman Michael Mack decides to end his tumultuous political career

Damon Hodge

So Michael Mack's calling it quits—to spend time with his kids and not, he says, for the politically expedient reason: escaping a campaign that'd likely make the malicious David Goldwater vs. Lynette Boggs McDonald donnybrook seem like a Sunday tea. Opponents would likely attack his Great Wall-like trail of ethical breaches, brick by brick.


How'd it come to this? Prior to his 1999 appointment to the then-new Ward 6 seat (he was re-elected in 2001), Mack was a mild-mannered pawnshop and jewelry store owner. Five years later, he's still mild-mannered, but everything else has changed. His business tanked, and he morphed into a recurrent political bumbler, his tenure devolving into an Ethical Lapsapalooza.


Let's see: Accepting money from one car-dealership owner while voting to deny a competitor's application. Criminal charges. Curious business ventures, including a consulting company whose associates and clients have remained secret. A curious business alliance with one of the mayor's sons. Hired to represent a strip club in the city's jurisdiction. Using City Hall to promote family interests. His name surfaced in the G-Sting political corruption probe. The cumulative effect will tarnish whatever good Mack might have done.


And it's hard to say who'll miss him more: journalists, who are losing a perennial dartboard, or city and state ethics boards, who must find a new whipping boy. The Weekly takes a chronological look back:



2000


September 8: Uses a $57,000 promissory note from Courtesy Automotive Group owner Joe Scala to pay interest on a bank loan; meantime, he and Scala arrange for the sale of Mack's First Class Pawn & Jewelry store, a sale that never occurs.


October 31: Mack defaults on the loan.



2001


February 12: Financial disclosure form reveals a $5,000 debt to People's Real Estate Investments, which Scala owns.


February 21: Votes to delay consideration of a Nissan dealership sought by John Staluppi Jr.; it would compete with Scala's property, without disclosing his relationship to Scala.


May 16: Votes to delay Staluppi's application and for a moratorium on new car dealerships in Centennial Hills; still no disclosure about Scala.


June 6: Votes in favor of the moratorium and against Staluppi's dealership without disclosing debt to Scala.


June 25: Staluppi associates file ethics complaints against him.


June 26: Mack asks the city attorney to return the Staluppi dealership application and moratorium items to the agenda so he can abstain.


July 5: He's in Arizona being treated for stress as the council denies Staluppi and OKs the moratorium.


August 29: City ethics board votes to hold a full hearing into the complaint.


September 28: Charges dismissed because the board fails to hold a hearing within the legally required 30 days.


October 17: Review board misses a deadline to hold a full hearing.


December 7: More than $4 million in debt, Mack files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.



2002


February 14: City ethics board rules he knowingly broke ethics code and refers the case to municipal court for prosecution as a misdemeanor.


March 27: His attorney, Richard Wright, challenges the ruling.


August 15: Criminal trial begins.


August 21: Municipal Court Judge Bert Brown acquits him of criminal conflict-of-interest charges.



2003


November: State Ethics Commission absolves Mack for abstaining on an item involving one of the mayor's sons, but admonishes him for not disclosing reasons for the abstention.



2004


October 21: Abstains from a vote transferring ownership of Super Pawn, owned by his brother, to Cash America Inc., which is buying the chain for $125 million; earlier in the year, he promoted Super Pawn in e-mails to City Hall workers.


November 17: Discloses his brother-in-law's ownership in the Lady Luck after voting to spend $1.3 million for three nearby residential properties that will become part of an expanded City Hall campus; says the purchases shouldn't affect his brother-in-law's interests.


Some things never change.

  • Get More Stories from Thu, Dec 9, 2004
Top of Story