The Reaping

Oscar winners usually find themselves offered the types of movies that will hopefully lead to more Oscar nominations: disease-of-the-week movies, social-injustice movies, biopics, costume dramas, movies based on important novels. Not so, Hilary Swank.

Jeffrey M. Anderson

The Reaping

*1/2

Hilary Swank, David Morrissey, Idris Elba, Stephen Rea

Directed by Stephen Hopkins

Rated R

Oscar winners usually find themselves offered the types of movies that will hopefully lead to more Oscar nominations: disease-of-the-week movies, social-injustice movies, biopics, costume dramas, movies based on important novels. That goes double for two-time winners. But Hilary Swank has the gumption to take a stab at a horror movie. Not even Bette Davis did that until she was well into her 50s (What Ever Happened to Baby Jane?).

Sadly, Swank’s choice has turned into The Reaping, an annoying, amateurish mish-mash. From the film’s first half-hour, however, it appears that there once may have been the seed of a good idea. Swank plays Katherine Winter, a fallen minister, who—after the death of her husband and child—now goes about scientifically debunking “miracles” all over the world. When the river near a small town called Haven turns blood red, Katherine and her faithful sidekick, Ben (Elba), heed the call. A river of blood, it turns out, is the first of the legendary 10 Plagues.

From there, the film turns into a convoluted mess, chucking any kind of logical flow in favor of cheap thrills. The film tosses around ideas of good and evil, God and the devil, faith and science, but rarely makes a coherent argument for any one over the other. The film’s most aggravating trait is its scare technique, which ratchets up the soundtrack, shakes the camera around and cuts fast enough to obscure whatever is supposed to be so scary. The effect is more like listening to a noisy neighbor than being scared.

Director Hopkins, a 20-year veteran of genre films, apparently has learned absolutely nothing from his time served on such pictures as A Nightmare on Elm Street: The Dream Child (1989) and The Ghost and the Darkness (1996). He hasn’t built anything resembling a style or even skill; he merely apes the latest slew of abrasive horror remakes. But Swank comes out shining, looking more dazzlingly gorgeous than ever and exhibiting a fresh kind of confidence. Perhaps she feels secure that she’s better than this material, and she would be correct. –Jeffrey M. Anderson

  • Get More Stories from Tue, May 8, 2007
Top of Story