A&E

Three wishes for the third ‘Hobbit’ film, after seeing the second

Image
We can’t get enough of the Elvish “princeling.”

1. More elves.

I know, I know, but dwarves and hobbits are slow and plodding, whereas every time an elf steps onscreen the pace picks up faster than you can unsheath an arrow. Sure, Legolas and Tauriel have been shoehorned into the story, and yes, Tauriel’s romance with Kili seems sappy at best, but I’m okay with all that if it means more manic, elf-fueled scenes like the barrel-riding run down the river.

2. Less Sauron referencing.

The Hobbit was never an intro to The Lord of the Rings, but now it kinda is, way beyond the introduction of Bilbo, Gollum and the ring. Mentioning Sauron, showing the eye and continually referencing the impending darkness isn’t just weird, it’s downright confusing, continuity-wise. After all this buildup, why is Gandalf so surprised by Sauron’s return at the start of Fellowship? Has his memory been washed with C-3PO’s and R2-D2’s?

3. A proper final blowout.

If Peter Jackson does one thing well, it’s staging epic battles. The Two Towers’ Helm’s Deep was better than I’d ever imagined growing up with the books, and The Return of the King’s Battle of the Pelennor Fields came close to meeting my ridiculously high expectations. When dwarves, elves, humans, goblins, wargs, eagles, a wizard, a hobbit and a skin-changing bear meet up, how can it be anything but bananas?

Share
Photo of Spencer Patterson

Spencer Patterson

Spencer Patterson is the Editor of Las Vegas Weekly, having previously served as Managing Editor, Arts & Entertainment Editor and ...

Get more Spencer Patterson
  • Everything in theaters this week, plus special screenings and movie reviews.

  • The movie stumbles within the framework of the great-artist biopic, but it can be affecting as a depiction of a troubled, sometimes tender romance.

  • Hint: Two from the ’50s, two from the ’70s and one from 1998. No, not that one.

  • Get More Film Stories
Top of Story